iX3
286 hp, 460 km range, 6,8 s 0-100 : among the 16 D-SUV electric 2018–2022, the iX3 ranks 8th of 11 in WLTP range, 11th of 16 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
286hp
400 Nm · 286 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.8s
VMax 180 km/h
Range
460km
WLTP
DC charging
—kW
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW iX3
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Puissance électrique | 286 hp |
| Combined power | 286 hp |
| Couple | 400 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 1 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | iX3 |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 74 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 460 km |
| Charge AC max | 11 kW |
| Conso élec WLTP | 19,0 kWh/100km |
| Cons. WLTP | 12,1 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,8 s |
| VMax | 180 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,734 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,864 mm |
| Width | 1,891 mm |
| Height | 1,668 mm |
| Boot | 510 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,185 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 0 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 16 D-SUV electric, the iX3 ranks (mid-table) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is WLTP range, the Volkswagen ID.4 Pro (1st with 522 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT (1st with 3.7 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 460 km WLTP (8th of 11 in WLTP range)
The iX3 offers 460 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Volkswagen ID.4 Pro (522 km).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the iX3 stands against D-SUV electric
Comparison across 16 D-SUV electric marketed between 2018–2022.
WLTP range
8eout of 11
0–100 km/h
11eout of 16
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Model Y Juniper RWD
299 hp · 0-100 6.0 s
Q6 SUV e-tron
302 hp · 0-100 6.7 s
Q6 Sportback e-tron
306 hp · 0-100 6.7 s
Model Y Juniper Long Range AWD
383 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the iX3
Take the next step
Find a iX3 or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
BMW iX3: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 16 D-SUV electric 2018–2022, the iX3 ranks 8th of 11 in WLTP range (460 km, behind the Volkswagen ID.4 Pro), 11th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (6.8 s, behind the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT).
460 km WLTP announced — making it the 8th of 11 in autonomie du segment out of 11 models. The reference is the Volkswagen ID.4 Pro (522 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Volkswagen ID.4 Pro leads in WLTP range (522 km vs 460 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the iX3 vs Volkswagen ID.4 Pro duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.