Sur 0–100 km/h, Q6 SUV e-tron gagne (6,82 s vs 8,51 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| G9 | Q6 SUV e-tron | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,51 s | 6,82 s+1,69 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,32 s | 15,01 s+1,31 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,71 s | 27,06 s+1,65 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 210 km/h−10 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,18 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,28 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | G9 | Q6 SUV e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,41 s | 1,93 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,03 s | 3,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,49 s | 5,19 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,51 s | 6,82 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,09 s | 8,93 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,51 s | 15,78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31,05 s | 28,10 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,32 s | 15,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,71 s | 27,06 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 308 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 210 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 302 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 485 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 200 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Q6 SUV e-tron hits 100 km/h in 6.82 s versus 8.51 s for the G9. At this point, the Q6 SUV e-tron leads by 1.69 s and sits roughly 19 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q6 SUV e-tron is doing 128 km/h against 120 km/h for the G9. The gap is 1.03 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q6 SUV e-tron crosses the line in 15.00 s versus 16.32 s. The 1.31 s gap represents roughly 54 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Q6 SUV e-tron continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 169 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q6 SUV e-tron finishes in 27.06 s versus 28.71 s, with a 1.65 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (200 vs 210 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the G9 is capped at 200 km/h, the Q6 SUV e-tron at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.18 kg/hp vs 7.28 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.63 seconds. The 1.69 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Q6 SUV e-tron gagne (6,82 s vs 8,51 s).
G9 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,51 secondes (simulation calibrée).
G9 : 308 hp, ratio 7,18 kg/hp. Q6 SUV e-tron : 302 hp, ratio 7,28 kg/hp.
G9 : 200 km/h. Q6 SUV e-tron : 210 km/h.