Over 0–100 km/h, Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW wins (5,13 s vs 6,58 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
6.58 s
| Measure | Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW | P7 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5.13 s | 6.58 s | 1.46 s · Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW |
| 400 m standing start | 13.31 s | 14.81 s | 1.50 s · Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.10 s | 27.64 s | 3.54 s · Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h | 170 km/h | 40 km/h · Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5.43 kg/hp | 7.59 kg/hp | better ratio · Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW | P7 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.50 s | 1.75 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.50 s | 2.93 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.01 s | 4.84 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5.13 s | 6.58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6.55 s | 8.81 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10.92 s | 15.66 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17.78 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 13.31 s | 14.81 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.10 s | 27.64 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 170 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 428 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 325 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 263 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 390 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 995 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW hits 100 km/h in 5.13 s versus 6.58 s for the P7. At this point, the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW leads by 1.46 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW is doing 143 km/h against 127 km/h for the P7. The gap is 0.94 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW crosses the line in 13.30 s versus 14.81 s. The 1.51 s gap represents roughly 64 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW finishes in 24.10 s versus 27.64 s, with a 3.54 s lead.
The Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the P7’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW is capped at 210 km/h, the P7 at 170 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.43 kg/hp vs 7.59 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.18 seconds. The 1.46 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW wins (5,13 s vs 6,58 s).
Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,13 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW: 428 hp, ratio 5,43 kg/hp. P7: 263 hp, ratio 7,59 kg/hp.
Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW: 210 km/h. P7: 170 km/h.