Over 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV wins (7,07 s vs 9,69 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q7 SUV | Kuga EcoBoost 150 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,07 s−2,62 s | 9,69 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,11 s−2,10 s | 17,21 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,09 s−3,21 s | 31,30 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 226 km/h+24 km/h | 202 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,09 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,71 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q7 SUV | Kuga EcoBoost 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,17 s | 2,30 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,22 s | 3,54 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,70 s | 6,86 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,07 s | 9,69 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,12 s | 13,85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,20 s | 26,92 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 37,54 s | 84,32 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,11 s | 17,21 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,09 s | 31,30 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h | 202 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 607 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the Q7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 7.07 s versus 9.69 s for the Kuga EcoBoost 150. At this point, the Q7 SUV leads by 2.62 s and sits roughly 34 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q7 SUV is doing 117 km/h against 107 km/h for the Kuga EcoBoost 150. The gap is 1.63 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q7 SUV crosses the line in 15.11 s versus 17.21 s. The 2.10 s gap represents roughly 76 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Q7 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 162 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q7 SUV finishes in 28.09 s versus 31.29 s, with a 3.21 s lead.
Electronically capped at 226 km/h, the Q7 SUV never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.09 kg/hp vs 10.71 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.19 seconds. The 2.62 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV wins (7,07 s vs 9,69 s).
Q7 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,07 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q7 SUV: 231 hp, ratio 9,09 kg/hp. Kuga EcoBoost 150: 150 hp, ratio 10,71 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV: 226 km/h. Kuga EcoBoost 150: 202 km/h.