Over 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV wins (6,89 s vs 8,16 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q7 SUV | 520i Touring G30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,89 s−1,27 s | 8,16 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,00 s−0,95 s | 15,95 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,72 s−1,57 s | 29,29 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 226 km/h+4 km/h | 222 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,44 kg/hp | 8,89 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q7 SUV | 520i Touring G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,30 s | 1,63 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,31 s | 2,83 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,66 s | 5,58 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,89 s | 8,16 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,75 s | 11,46 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,12 s | 21,54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 33,89 s | 43,80 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,00 s | 15,95 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,72 s | 29,29 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h | 222 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 290 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 635 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Q7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 6.89 s versus 8.16 s for the 520i Touring. At this point, the Q7 SUV leads by 1.27 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q7 SUV is doing 119 km/h against 114 km/h for the 520i Touring. The gap is 0.69 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q7 SUV crosses the line in 15.00 s versus 15.95 s. The 0.95 s gap represents roughly 37 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Q7 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 165 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q7 SUV finishes in 27.71 s versus 29.29 s, with a 1.57 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (226 vs 222 km/h), preventing any comeback.
The Q7 SUV features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the 520i Touring’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Q7 SUV and the 520i Touring are governed to 226 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.44 kg/hp vs 8.89 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.47 seconds. The 1.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV wins (6,89 s vs 8,16 s).
Q7 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,89 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q7 SUV: 231 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp. 520i Touring G30: 184 hp, ratio 8,89 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV: 226 km/h. 520i Touring G30: 222 km/h.