520i Touring
184 hp, 8,2 s 0-100 : among the 92 grand tourers 2016–2020, the 520i Touring ranks 58th of 92 in Combined consumption, 56th of 90 in Tank range, 91th of 92 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
184hp
290 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.2s
VMax 225 km/h
Cons.
6.3L
/100 km
Tank
68L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 520i Touring
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 184 hp |
| Couple | 290 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | RWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6,3 L/100km |
| Tank | 68 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,2 s |
| VMax | 225 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,942 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,975 mm |
| Width | 1,868 mm |
| Height | 1,498 mm |
| Boot | 570 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,635 kg |
| Cd | 0.28 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 143 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 92 grand tourers, the 520i Touring ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Fuel consumption: 6.3 L/100 L/100 (58th of 92 in Combined consumption)
The 520i Touring consumes 6.3 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 520d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 1079 km (56th of 90 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 520i Touring covers 1079 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1535 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the 520i Touring stands against grand tourers
Comparison across 92 grand tourers marketed between 2016–2020.
Combined consumption
58eout of 92
Tank range
56eout of 90
0–100 km/h
91eout of 92
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
A6 Sedan
204 hp · 0-100 8.2 s
A6 Avant TFSI S tronic 150 kW
204 hp · 0-100 8.3 s
A6 45 TFSI
245 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
Superb 2.0 TSI 220 7DSG
220 hp · 0-100 6.5 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 5 Series G30 range
Generation G30 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G30
Compare
Popular duels involving the 520i Touring
Take the next step
Find a 520i Touring or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
BMW 520i Touring: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 92 grand tourers 2016–2020, the 520i Touring ranks 58th of 92 in Combined consumption (6.3 L/100, behind the Bmw 520d), 56th of 90 in Tank range (1079 km, behind the Bmw 520d), 91th of 92 in 0–100 km/h (8.2 s, behind the Bmw M5 Competition).
1079 km on a full tank (6.3 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 56th of 90 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 520d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 6.3 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 520i Touring vs Bmw 520d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.