Over 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV wins (6,89 s vs 7,15 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q7 SUV | Ateca | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,89 s−0,26 s | 7,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,00 s−0,32 s | 15,32 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,72 s−0,10 s | 27,82 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 226 km/h+8 km/h | 218 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,44 kg/hp | 8,50 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q7 SUV | Ateca |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,30 s | 1,96 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,31 s | 2,93 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,66 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,89 s | 7,15 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,75 s | 9,81 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,12 s | 17,57 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 33,89 s | 32,93 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,00 s | 15,32 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,72 s | 27,82 stight gap |
| Top speed | 226 km/h | 218 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 615 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG |
Off the line, the Q7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 6.89 s versus 7.15 s for the Ateca. At this point, the Q7 SUV leads by 0.26 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q7 SUV is doing 119 km/h against 122 km/h for the Ateca. The gap is 0.43 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q7 SUV crosses the line in 15.00 s versus 15.32 s. The 0.32 s gap represents roughly 13 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Ateca maxes out at 218 km/h while the Q7 SUV keeps accelerating towards 226 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 0.23 s from 0.32 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the Q7 SUV finishes in 27.71 s versus 27.81 s, with just 0.10 s to spare. The Ateca fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q7 SUV is capped at 226 km/h, the Ateca at 218 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.44 kg/hp vs 8.50 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.45 seconds. The 0.26 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV wins (6,89 s vs 7,15 s).
Q7 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,89 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q7 SUV: 231 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp. Ateca: 190 hp, ratio 8,50 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV: 226 km/h. Ateca: 218 km/h.