Over 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV wins (5,15 s vs 6,08 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q7 SUV | i4 eDrive35 G26 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s−0,93 s | 6,08 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,41 s−0,97 s | 14,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,35 s−1,91 s | 26,26 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+50 km/h | 190 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,88 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,99 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q7 SUV | i4 eDrive35 G26 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,35 s | 1,69 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,26 s | 2,81 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,77 s | 4,56 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s | 6,08 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,87 s | 8,04 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,60 s | 14,28 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,18 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 13,41 s | 14,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,35 s | 26,26 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 190 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 489 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 385 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 000 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
Off the line, the Q7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 5.15 s versus 6.08 s for the i4 eDrive35. At this point, the Q7 SUV leads by 0.93 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q7 SUV is doing 139 km/h against 131 km/h for the i4 eDrive35. The gap is 0.69 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q7 SUV crosses the line in 13.41 s versus 14.38 s. The 0.97 s gap represents roughly 43 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Q7 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 192 km/h versus 179 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q7 SUV finishes in 24.35 s versus 26.26 s, with a 1.91 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q7 SUV is capped at 240 km/h, the i4 eDrive35 at 190 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.88 kg/hp vs 6.99 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.27 seconds. The 0.93 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV wins (5,15 s vs 6,08 s).
Q7 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,15 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q7 SUV: 489 hp, ratio 4,88 kg/hp. i4 eDrive35 G26: 286 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV: 240 km/h. i4 eDrive35 G26: 190 km/h.