BMW i4 eDrive35

ElectricsaloonGENERATION G26, 2024

286 hp, 406 km range, 6,0 s 0-100 : among the 15 saloons electric 2022–2026, the i4 eDrive35 ranks 14th of 14 in WLTP range, 6th of 7 in DC charge power, 12th of 15 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
286 hp
400 Nm, dont 286 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.0 s
VMax 190 km/h
Range
406 km
WLTP
DC charging
180 kW

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Electric power
286 hp
Combined power
286 hp
Couple
400 Nm
Gearbox
Mono-rapport Automatique

Battery and charging

Battery capacity
67.1 kWh
Range WLTP
406 km
Charge AC max
11 kW
Charge DC max
180 kW
EV cons. WLTP
18.6 kWh/100 km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
6,0 s
VMax
190 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,783 mm
Wheelbase
2,856 mm
Width
1,852 mm
Height
1,448 mm
Boot
470 L
Kerb weight
2,000 kg
Cd
0.24

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 15 saloons electric, the i4 eDrive35 ranks (last in segment) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is WLTP range, the Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD (1st with 830 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Tesla Model 3 Performance (1st with 250 kW) takes the lead.

Real-world range: 406 km WLTP (14th of 14 in WLTP range)

The i4 eDrive35 offers 406 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD (830 km).

Charging: 180 kW DC (6th of 7 in DC charge power)

The i4 eDrive35 accepts up to 180 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Tesla Model 3 Performance (250 kW).

Where the i4 eDrive35 stands against saloons electric

Comparison across 15 saloons electric marketed between 2022–2026.
WLTP range14e / 14
406 km
Min 406 km · BMW i4 eDrive35Max 830 km · Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD
DC charge power6e / 7
180 kW
Min 170 kW · Tesla Model 3 RWDMax 250 kW · Tesla Model 3 Performance
0–100 km/h12e / 15
6,0 s
Min 9,5 s · BYD Seal U 160kW 2WDMax 2,0 s · Xiaomi SU7 Ultra AWD

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full BMW i4 G26 range

Generation G26 launched in 2021. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G26

Popular duels involving the i4 eDrive35

Continue with the BMW i4 eDrive35

The same car, from other angles.

BMW i4 eDrive35: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the i4 eDrive35 rank in its segment?

Among the 15 saloons electric 2022–2026, the i4 eDrive35 ranks 14th of 14 in WLTP range (406 km, behind the Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD), 6th of 7 in DC charge power (180 kW, behind the Tesla Model 3 Performance), 12th of 15 in 0–100 km/h (6.0 s, behind the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra AWD).

What is the WLTP range of the i4 eDrive35?

406 km WLTP announced - making it the 14th of 14 in WLTP range out of 14 models. The reference is the Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD (830 km).

How much does the i4 eDrive35 cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD instead?

The Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD leads in WLTP range (830 km vs 406 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the i4 eDrive35 vs Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.