Over 0–100 km/h, Q8 SUV wins (4,93 s vs 5,39 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q8 SUV | G 500 W463 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,93 s−0,46 s | 5,39 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,19 s−0,49 s | 13,68 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,97 s−1,22 s | 25,19 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+30 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,94 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,53 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q8 SUV | G 500 W463 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,29 s | 1,29 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,14 s | 2,18 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,60 s | 3,83 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,93 s | 5,39 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,58 s | 7,14 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,10 s | 12,66 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,18 s | 23,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,19 s | 13,68 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,97 s | 25,19 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 489 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 415 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 449 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 560 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 485 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Q8 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.93 s versus 5.40 s for the G 500. The instant torque of 700 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Q8 SUV leads by 0.46 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q8 SUV is doing 140 km/h against 133 km/h for the G 500. The gap is 0.26 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q8 SUV crosses the line in 13.18 s versus 13.68 s. The 0.50 s gap represents roughly 23 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Q8 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 195 km/h versus 183 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q8 SUV finishes in 23.96 s versus 25.19 s, with a 1.22 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q8 SUV is capped at 240 km/h, the G 500 at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.48 seconds. The 0.46 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Q8 SUV wins (4,93 s vs 5,39 s).
Q8 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,93 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q8 SUV: 489 hp, ratio 4,94 kg/hp. G 500 W463: 449 hp, ratio 5,53 kg/hp.
Q8 SUV: 240 km/h. G 500 W463: 210 km/h.