G 500
449 hp, 5,4 s 0-100 : among the 6 F-SUV hybrid 2022–2026, the G 500 ranks 3rd of 6 in 0–100 km/h, 4th of 6 in Top speed, 3rd of 6 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Mercedes AMG G 63. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
449hp
560 Nm · 20 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
5.4s
VMax 210 km/h
Cons.
12.3L
/100 km
Tank
100L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Mercedes G 500
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Displacement | 2,999 cm\u00b3 |
| Puissance électrique | 20 hp |
| Combined power | 449 hp |
| Couple | 560 Nm |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 12,3 L/100km |
| Tank | 100 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,4 s |
| VMax | 210 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,825 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,890 mm |
| Width | 1,913 mm |
| Height | 1,973 mm |
| Boot | 640 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,485 kg |
| CO₂ WLTP | 281 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 6 F-SUV hybrid, the G 500 ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Mercedes AMG G 63 (1st with 4.4 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Mercedes AMG G 63 (1st with 220 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 5.4 s 0-100 (3rd of 6 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the G 500 ranks 3rd of 6 in 0–100 km/h, 1.0 s off the reference Mercedes AMG G 63 (4.4 s).
Top speed: 210 km/h (4th of 6 in Top speed)
Top speed of 210 km/h. The segment reference reaches 220 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the G 500 stands against F-SUV hybrid
Comparison across 6 F-SUV hybrid marketed between 2022–2026.
0–100 km/h
3eout of 6
Top speed
4eout of 6
Power-to-weight
3eout of 6
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
XM 50e
476 hp · 0-100 5.1 s
X7 xDrive40i
333 hp · 0-100 6.3 s
X7 xDrive50i
462 hp · 0-100 5.4 s
X7 M50d
400 hp · 0-100 5.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Mercedes G-Class W463 range
Generation W463 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the W463
Compare
Popular duels involving the G 500
Take the next step
Find a G 500 or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Mercedes G 500: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 6 F-SUV hybrid 2022–2026, the G 500 ranks 3rd of 6 in 0–100 km/h (5.4 s, behind the Mercedes AMG G 63), 4th of 6 in Top speed (210 km/h, behind the Mercedes AMG G 63), 3rd of 6 in Power-to-weight (181 hp/t, behind the Mercedes AMG G 63).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Mercedes AMG G 63 leads in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s vs 5.4 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the G 500 vs Mercedes AMG G 63 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.