Over 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sportback wins (3,88 s vs 4,63 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS 3 Sportback | 750Ld xDrive G11 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s−0,75 s | 4,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s−0,76 s | 12,84 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,05 s−1,13 s | 23,18 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,91 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,95 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS 3 Sportback | 750Ld xDrive G11 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,04 s | 1,25 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,74 s | 2,07 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,85 s | 3,44 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s | 4,63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,07 s | 6,14 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,84 s | 10,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,81 s | 16,08 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s | 12,84 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,05 s | 23,18 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 565 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 980 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the RS 3 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 3.88 s versus 4.63 s for the 750Ld xDrive. At this point, the RS 3 Sportback leads by 0.75 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS 3 Sportback is doing 150 km/h against 145 km/h for the 750Ld xDrive. The gap is 0.58 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS 3 Sportback crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 12.84 s. The 0.76 s gap represents roughly 37 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS 3 Sportback continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 211 km/h versus 203 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS 3 Sportback finishes in 22.04 s versus 23.18 s, with a 1.14 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the RS 3 Sportback and the 750Ld xDrive are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.91 kg/hp vs 4.95 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.01 seconds. The 0.75 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sportback wins (3,88 s vs 4,63 s).
RS 3 Sportback goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,88 seconds (calibrated simulation).
RS 3 Sportback: 400 hp, ratio 3,91 kg/hp. 750Ld xDrive G11: 400 hp, ratio 4,95 kg/hp.
RS 3 Sportback: 250 km/h. 750Ld xDrive G11: 250 km/h.