Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sportback gagne (3,88 s vs 4,67 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS 3 Sportback | M240i F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s−0,79 s | 4,67 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s−0,70 s | 12,78 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,05 s−0,98 s | 23,03 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,91 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,49 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS 3 Sportback | M240i F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,04 s | 1,33 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,74 s | 2,21 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,85 s | 3,53 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s | 4,67 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,07 s | 6,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,84 s | 9,80 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,81 s | 15,52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s | 12,78 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,05 s | 23,03 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 565 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
Off the line, the RS 3 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 3.88 s versus 4.67 s for the Bmw M240i. At this point, the RS 3 Sportback leads by 0.79 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS 3 Sportback is doing 150 km/h against 147 km/h for the Bmw M240i. The gap is 0.60 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS 3 Sportback crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 12.78 s. The 0.70 s gap represents roughly 35 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS 3 Sportback continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 211 km/h versus 205 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS 3 Sportback finishes in 22.04 s versus 23.03 s, with a 0.99 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
The RS 3 Sportback features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Bmw M240i’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the RS 3 Sportback and the Bmw M240i are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.91 kg/hp vs 4.49 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.84 seconds. The 0.79 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sportback gagne (3,88 s vs 4,67 s).
RS 3 Sportback passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,88 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RS 3 Sportback : 400 hp, ratio 3,91 kg/hp. M240i F44 : 340 hp, ratio 4,49 kg/hp.
RS 3 Sportback : 250 km/h. M240i F44 : 250 km/h.