Over 0–100 km/h, RS 5 Sedan wins (3,73 s vs 4,94 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS 5 Sedan | SQ2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,73 s−1,21 s | 4,94 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,78 s−1,69 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,38 s−3,17 s | 24,55 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 257 km/h−7 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,69 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,12 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS 5 Sedan | SQ2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,01 s | 1,24 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,68 s | 2,07 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,74 s | 3,54 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,73 s | 4,94 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,89 s | 7,19 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,03 s | 12,14 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,49 s | 19,93 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,78 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,38 s | 24,55 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 257 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 639 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 825 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 355 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the RS 5 Sedan hits 100 km/h in 3.73 s versus 4.94 s for the SQ2. The instant torque of 825 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the RS 5 Sedan leads by 1.21 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS 5 Sedan is doing 156 km/h against 133 km/h for the SQ2. The gap is 1.04 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS 5 Sedan crosses the line in 11.77 s versus 13.47 s. The 1.70 s gap represents roughly 77 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS 5 Sedan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 218 km/h versus 190 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS 5 Sedan finishes in 21.38 s versus 24.55 s, with a 3.17 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 257 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the RS 5 Sedan never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.36 seconds. The 1.21 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, RS 5 Sedan wins (3,73 s vs 4,94 s).
RS 5 Sedan goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,73 seconds (calibrated simulation).
RS 5 Sedan: 639 hp, ratio 3,69 kg/hp. SQ2: 300 hp, ratio 5,12 kg/hp.
RS 5 Sedan: 250 km/h. SQ2: 257 km/h.