Sur 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT gagne (3,33 s vs 3,46 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS e-tron GT | RS6 Performance Avant | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,33 s−0,13 s | 3,46 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,32 s | 11,31 s+0,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,60 s | 20,37 s+0,23 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 346 km/h−96 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,57 kg/hp | 3,45 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS e-tron GT | RS6 Performance Avant |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,95 s | 0,99 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,59 s | 1,65 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,55 s | 2,63 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,33 s | 3,46 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,32 s | 4,45 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,15 s | 7,06 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,16 s | 10,72 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,32 s | 11,31 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,60 s | 20,37 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 346 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 671 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 630 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 850 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 175 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the RS e-tron GT hits 100 km/h in 3.33 s versus 3.46 s for the RS6 Performance Avant. The instant torque of 830 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the RS e-tron GT leads by 0.13 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS e-tron GT is doing 163 km/h against 165 km/h for the RS6 Performance Avant. The gap is 0.06 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS6 Performance Avant crosses the line in 11.30 s versus 11.31 s. The 0.01 s gap represents roughly 0 m of track
Past 400 metres, the RS6 Performance Avant continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 231 km/h versus 227 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS6 Performance Avant finishes in 20.37 s versus 20.60 s, with a 0.23 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the RS e-tron GT never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.02 seconds. The 0.13 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT gagne (3,33 s vs 3,46 s).
RS e-tron GT passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,33 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RS e-tron GT : 671 hp, ratio 3,57 kg/hp. RS6 Performance Avant : 630 hp, ratio 3,45 kg/hp.
RS e-tron GT : 250 km/h. RS6 Performance Avant : 346 km/h.