Over 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT wins (3,33 s vs 5,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS e-tron GT | 740Le iPerformance G11 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,33 s−2,25 s | 5,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,32 s−2,45 s | 13,77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,60 s−4,45 s | 25,05 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,57 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,95 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS e-tron GT | 740Le iPerformance G11 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,95 s | 1,29 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,59 s | 2,14 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,55 s | 3,85 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,33 s | 5,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,32 s | 7,52 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,15 s | 12,85 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,16 s | 21,11 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,32 s | 13,77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,60 s | 25,05 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 671 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 940 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the RS e-tron GT hits 100 km/h in 3.33 s versus 5.58 s for the Bmw 740Le iPerformance. At this point, the RS e-tron GT leads by 2.25 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS e-tron GT is doing 163 km/h against 132 km/h for the Bmw 740Le iPerformance. The gap is 1.59 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS e-tron GT crosses the line in 11.31 s versus 13.77 s. The 2.46 s gap represents roughly 108 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS e-tron GT continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 227 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS e-tron GT finishes in 20.60 s versus 25.05 s, with a 4.45 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the RS e-tron GT and the Bmw 740Le iPerformance are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.57 kg/hp vs 5.95 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.68 seconds. The 2.25 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT wins (3,33 s vs 5,58 s).
RS e-tron GT goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,33 seconds (calibrated simulation).
RS e-tron GT: 671 hp, ratio 3,57 kg/hp. 740Le iPerformance G11: 326 hp, ratio 5,95 kg/hp.
RS e-tron GT: 250 km/h. 740Le iPerformance G11: 250 km/h.