Sur 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT gagne (3,33 s vs 4,66 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS e-tron GT | i7 xDrive60 G70 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,33 s−1,33 s | 4,66 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,32 s−1,54 s | 12,86 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,60 s−2,57 s | 23,17 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+10 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,57 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,85 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS e-tron GT | i7 xDrive60 G70 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,95 s | 1,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,59 s | 2,17 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,55 s | 3,51 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,33 s | 4,66 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,32 s | 6,09 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,15 s | 10,15 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,16 s | 16,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,32 s | 12,86 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,60 s | 23,17 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 671 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 544 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 745 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-stage with fixed ratio |
Off the line, the RS e-tron GT hits 100 km/h in 3.33 s versus 4.66 s for the Bmw i7 xDrive60. At this point, the RS e-tron GT leads by 1.33 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS e-tron GT is doing 163 km/h against 145 km/h for the Bmw i7 xDrive60. The gap is 1.08 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS e-tron GT crosses the line in 11.31 s versus 12.86 s. The 1.55 s gap represents roughly 75 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS e-tron GT continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 227 km/h versus 203 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS e-tron GT finishes in 20.60 s versus 23.17 s, with a 2.57 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the RS e-tron GT is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw i7 xDrive60 at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.57 kg/hp vs 4.85 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.94 seconds. The 1.33 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT gagne (3,33 s vs 4,66 s).
RS e-tron GT passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,33 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RS e-tron GT : 671 hp, ratio 3,57 kg/hp. i7 xDrive60 G70 : 544 hp, ratio 4,85 kg/hp.
RS e-tron GT : 250 km/h. i7 xDrive60 G70 : 240 km/h.