Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S P85D gagne (3,33 s vs 3,34 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS e-tron GT | Model S P85D | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,34 s | 3,33 s+0,01 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,17 s−0,01 s | 11,18 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,27 s−0,04 s | 20,31 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,25 kg/hp | 3,24 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS e-tron GT | Model S P85D |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,98 s | 0,98 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,64 s | 1,64 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,63 s | 2,62 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,34 s | 3,33 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,24 s | 4,21 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,79 s | 6,80 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,40 s | 10,49 stight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 11,17 s | 11,18 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,27 s | 20,31 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 738 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 691 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 931 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 239 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model S P85D hits 100 km/h in 3.33 s versus 3.34 s for the RS e-tron GT. The 0.01 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Model S P85D is doing 167 km/h against 167 km/h for the RS e-tron GT. The gap is 0.01 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS e-tron GT crosses the line in 11.17 s versus 11.17 s. The 0.01 s gap represents roughly 0 m of track
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory — both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.04 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere — range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the RS e-tron GT and the Model S P85D are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.25 kg/hp vs 3.24 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.78 seconds. The 0.01 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S P85D gagne (3,33 s vs 3,34 s).
RS e-tron GT passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,34 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RS e-tron GT : 738 hp, ratio 3,25 kg/hp. Model S P85D : 691 hp, ratio 3,24 kg/hp.
RS e-tron GT : 250 km/h. Model S P85D : 250 km/h.