Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
ASBEVvsBGiuliaPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsS · Giulia

Audi S e-tron GT vs Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

grand tourer · 2025 vs 2016 · Methodology
AudiBEVFaster

S e-tron GT

670 hp · 640 Nm · 2,325 kg · 2025

VS
Alfa RomeoPetrol

Giulia Quadrifoglio

510 hp · 600 Nm · 1,580 kg · 2016

Result · 0–100 km/h

AAudi S e-tron GT

3.35 s

Gap0.58 sin favour of S e-tron GT
BAlfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio

3.94 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureS e-tron GTGiulia QuadrifoglioGap
0–100 km/h3.35 s3.94 s0.58 s · S e-tron GT
400 m standing start11.51 s11.74 s0.23 s · S e-tron GT
1,000 m standing start21.11 s20.93 s0.18 s · Giulia Quadrifoglio
Top speed (electronically limited)245 km/h307 km/h62 km/h · Giulia Quadrifoglio
Power-to-weight ratio3.47 kg/hp3.10 kg/hpbetter ratio · Giulia Quadrifoglio

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

AudiBEVS e-tron GT
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
Alfa RomeoPetrolGiulia Quadrifoglio
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageS e-tron GTGiulia Quadrifoglio
0–30 km/h0.90 s1.19 s
0–50 km/h1.50 s1.98 s
0–80 km/h2.48 s3.18 s
0–100 km/h3.35 s3.94 s
0–120 km/h4.46 s4.97 s
0–160 km/h7.66 s7.57 s · tight gap
0–200 km/h12.25 s11.32 s
400 m standing start11.51 s11.74 s
1,000 m standing start21.11 s20.93 s
Top speed245 km/h307 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Audi

S e-tron GT

3,47kg/hpcompensated by −745 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power670 hpPending
Torque640 Nm
Weight2 325 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxUnknown
Alfa Romeo

Giulia Quadrifoglio

3,10kg/hpratio better by 0,37 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power510 hpPending
Torque600 Nm
Weight1 580 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
Gearbox8-speed automatic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the S e-tron GT hits 100 km/h in 3.36 s versus 3.94 s for the Giulia Quadrifoglio. The instant torque of 640 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the S e-tron GT leads by 0.59 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the S e-tron GT is doing 158 km/h against 164 km/h for the Giulia Quadrifoglio. The gap is 0.40 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the S e-tron GT crosses the line in 11.50 s versus 11.74 s. The 0.23 s gap represents roughly 13 m of track - two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The S e-tron GT maxes out at 245 km/h while the Giulia Quadrifoglio keeps accelerating towards 307 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.07 s.

Around 705 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Giulia Quadrifoglio overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 62 km/h higher top speed.

At 1,000 metres, the Giulia Quadrifoglio finishes in 20.93 s versus 21.11 s. The 0.18 s delta shows an extremely tight race.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the S e-tron GT is capped at 245 km/h, the Giulia Quadrifoglio at 307 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.51 seconds. The 0.59 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSPorsche

S e-tron GT vs Taycan Turbo

AlfaVSBMW

Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs M3 Competition

AudiVSPorsche

S e-tron GT vs Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo

AlfaVSBMW

Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs M3 Competition Sedan

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, S e-tron GT wins (3,35 s vs 3,94 s).

S e-tron GT goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).

S e-tron GT: 670 hp, ratio 3,47 kg/hp. Giulia Quadrifoglio: 510 hp, ratio 3,10 kg/hp.

S e-tron GT: 245 km/h. Giulia Quadrifoglio: 307 km/h.