Over 0–100 km/h, S e-tron GT wins (3,35 s vs 4,50 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | S e-tron GT | S5 Sedan | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3.35 s | 4.50 s | 1.15 s · S e-tron GT |
| 400 m standing start | 11.51 s | 12.80 s | 1.29 s · S e-tron GT |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21.11 s | 23.39 s | 2.28 s · S e-tron GT |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h | 250 km/h | 5 km/h · S5 Sedan |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3.47 kg/hp | 5.31 kg/hp | better ratio · S e-tron GT |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | S e-tron GT | S5 Sedan |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0.90 s | 1.11 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.50 s | 1.85 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2.48 s | 3.22 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3.35 s | 4.50 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4.46 s | 6.11 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7.66 s | 10.43 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12.25 s | 16.98 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11.51 s | 12.80 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21.11 s | 23.39 s |
| Top speed limited | 245 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 670 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 640 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 325 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 950 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the S e-tron GT hits 100 km/h in 3.36 s versus 4.50 s for the S5 Sedan. The instant torque of 640 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the S e-tron GT leads by 1.15 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the S e-tron GT is doing 158 km/h against 142 km/h for the S5 Sedan. The gap is 0.88 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the S e-tron GT crosses the line in 11.50 s versus 12.80 s. The 1.30 s gap represents roughly 62 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the S e-tron GT continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 219 km/h versus 198 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the S e-tron GT finishes in 21.11 s versus 23.38 s, with a 2.27 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (245 vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the S e-tron GT is capped at 245 km/h, the S5 Sedan at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.04 seconds. The 1.15 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, S e-tron GT wins (3,35 s vs 4,50 s).
S e-tron GT goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).
S e-tron GT: 670 hp, ratio 3,47 kg/hp. S5 Sedan: 367 hp, ratio 5,31 kg/hp.
S e-tron GT: 245 km/h. S5 Sedan: 250 km/h.