Sur 0–100 km/h, S6 Sportback e-tron gagne (4,08 s vs 5,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| S6 Sportback e-tron | 740Le iPerformance G11 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,08 s−1,50 s | 5,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,52 s−1,25 s | 13,77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,58 s−1,47 s | 25,05 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 233 km/h | 250 km/h−17 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,28 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,95 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | S6 Sportback e-tron | 740Le iPerformance G11 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,11 s | 1,29 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,86 s | 2,14 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,03 s | 3,85 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,08 s | 5,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,44 s | 7,52 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,00 s | 12,85 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,13 s | 21,11 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,52 s | 13,77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,58 s | 25,05 s |
| Top speed limited | 233 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 543 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 325 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 940 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the S6 Sportback e-tron hits 100 km/h in 4.08 s versus 5.58 s for the Bmw 740Le iPerformance. At this point, the S6 Sportback e-tron leads by 1.51 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the S6 Sportback e-tron is doing 146 km/h against 132 km/h for the Bmw 740Le iPerformance. The gap is 0.91 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the S6 Sportback e-tron crosses the line in 12.52 s versus 13.77 s. The 1.25 s gap represents roughly 56 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the S6 Sportback e-tron continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the S6 Sportback e-tron finishes in 23.58 s versus 25.05 s, with a 1.47 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), the Bmw 740Le iPerformance never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the S6 Sportback e-tron is capped at 240 km/h, the Bmw 740Le iPerformance at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.28 kg/hp vs 5.95 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.68 seconds. The 1.51 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, S6 Sportback e-tron gagne (4,08 s vs 5,58 s).
S6 Sportback e-tron passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,08 secondes (simulation calibrée).
S6 Sportback e-tron : 543 hp, ratio 4,28 kg/hp. 740Le iPerformance G11 : 326 hp, ratio 5,95 kg/hp.
S6 Sportback e-tron : 233 km/h. 740Le iPerformance G11 : 250 km/h.