Sur 0–100 km/h, Taycan 4S J1.1 gagne (3,93 s vs 4,08 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| S6 Sportback e-tron | Taycan 4S J1.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,08 s | 3,93 s+0,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,52 s | 12,07 s+0,45 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,58 s | 21,83 s+1,75 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 233 km/h | 250 km/h−17 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,28 kg/hp | 4,14 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | S6 Sportback e-tron | Taycan 4S J1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,11 s | 1,07 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,86 s | 1,79 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,03 s | 2,92 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,08 s | 3,93 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,44 s | 5,20 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,00 s | 8,59 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,13 s | 13,40 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,52 s | 12,07 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,58 s | 21,83 s |
| Top speed limited | 233 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 543 hp | |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 325 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 523 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PSM) |
| Torque | 640 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 164 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed front / Two-speed dog-ring rear |
Off the line, the Taycan 4S hits 100 km/h in 3.93 s versus 4.08 s for the S6 Sportback e-tron. At this point, the Taycan 4S leads by 0.15 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Taycan 4S is doing 153 km/h against 146 km/h for the S6 Sportback e-tron. The gap is 0.17 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Taycan 4S crosses the line in 12.06 s versus 12.52 s. The 0.46 s gap represents roughly 22 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Taycan 4S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 191 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Taycan 4S finishes in 21.83 s versus 23.58 s, with a 1.75 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the S6 Sportback e-tron is capped at 240 km/h, the Taycan 4S at 249 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.28 kg/hp vs 4.14 kg/hp) and transmission (auto vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.31 seconds. The 0.15 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Taycan 4S J1.1 gagne (3,93 s vs 4,08 s).
S6 Sportback e-tron passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,08 secondes (simulation calibrée).
S6 Sportback e-tron : 543 hp, ratio 4,28 kg/hp. Taycan 4S J1.1 : 523 hp, ratio 4,14 kg/hp.
S6 Sportback e-tron : 233 km/h. Taycan 4S J1.1 : 250 km/h.