Over 0–100 km/h, SQ2 wins (4,94 s vs 6,97 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ2 | 320d Touring G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,94 s−2,03 s | 6,97 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s−1,58 s | 15,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,55 s−3,39 s | 27,94 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 257 km/h+27 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,12 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,58 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ2 | 320d Touring G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,24 s | 1,16 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,07 s | 2,20 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,54 s | 4,69 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,94 s | 6,97 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,19 s | 9,95 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,14 s | 18,79 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,93 s | 36,02 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s | 15,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,55 s | 27,94 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 630 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the SQ2 hits 100 km/h in 4.94 s versus 6.97 s for the Bmw 320d Touring. At this point, the SQ2 leads by 2.03 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ2 is doing 133 km/h against 118 km/h for the Bmw 320d Touring. The gap is 0.89 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ2 crosses the line in 13.47 s versus 15.05 s. The 1.58 s gap represents roughly 62 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ2 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 163 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ2 finishes in 24.55 s versus 27.93 s, with a 3.38 s lead.
Electronically capped at 230 km/h, the Bmw 320d Touring never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.12 kg/hp vs 8.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.70 seconds. The 2.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ2 wins (4,94 s vs 6,97 s).
SQ2 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,94 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ2: 300 hp, ratio 5,12 kg/hp. 320d Touring G20: 190 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp.
SQ2: 257 km/h. 320d Touring G20: 230 km/h.