Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ5 Sportback gagne (4,42 s vs 4,99 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ5 Sportback | X3 M40d G01 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s−0,57 s | 4,99 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,76 s−0,58 s | 13,34 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,50 s−0,97 s | 24,47 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,56 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,94 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ5 Sportback | X3 M40d G01 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,06 s | 1,23 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,78 s | 2,00 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,15 s | 3,55 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s | 4,99 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,02 s | 6,82 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,50 s | 11,90 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,55 s | 20,11 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,76 s | 13,34 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,50 s | 24,47 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 020 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the SQ5 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 4.42 s versus 4.99 s for the Bmw X3 M40d. At this point, the SQ5 Sportback leads by 0.57 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ5 Sportback is doing 142 km/h against 137 km/h for the Bmw X3 M40d. The gap is 0.41 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ5 Sportback crosses the line in 12.76 s versus 13.34 s. The 0.58 s gap represents roughly 27 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the SQ5 Sportback continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 189 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ5 Sportback finishes in 23.50 s versus 24.47 s, with a 0.97 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the SQ5 Sportback and the Bmw X3 M40d are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.56 kg/hp vs 5.94 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.88 seconds. The 0.57 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ5 Sportback gagne (4,42 s vs 4,99 s).
SQ5 Sportback passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,42 secondes (simulation calibrée).
SQ5 Sportback : 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp. X3 M40d G01 : 340 hp, ratio 5,94 kg/hp.
SQ5 Sportback : 250 km/h. X3 M40d G01 : 250 km/h.