Over 0–100 km/h, SQ5 SUV wins (4,42 s vs 11,24 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | SQ5 SUV | 216d Active Tourer F44 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.42 s | 11.24 s | 6.82 s · SQ5 SUV |
| 400 m standing start | 12.76 s | 18.19 s | 5.43 s · SQ5 SUV |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.50 s | 32.71 s | 9.21 s · SQ5 SUV |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 195 km/h | 55 km/h · SQ5 SUV |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5.56 kg/hp | 12.24 kg/hp | better ratio · SQ5 SUV |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | SQ5 SUV | 216d Active Tourer F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.06 s | 2.74 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.78 s | 4.51 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.15 s | 8.00 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.42 s | 11.24 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6.02 s | 15.62 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10.50 s | 30.48 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17.55 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 12.76 s | 18.19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.50 s | 32.71 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 195 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 116 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 270 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 420 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed Steptronic with double clutch) |
Off the line, the SQ5 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.42 s versus 11.24 s for the 216d Active Tourer. At this point, the SQ5 SUV leads by 6.82 s and sits roughly 40 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ5 SUV is doing 142 km/h against 104 km/h for the 216d Active Tourer. The gap is 3.81 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ5 SUV crosses the line in 12.76 s versus 18.18 s. The 5.43 s gap represents roughly 180 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ5 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 145 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ5 SUV finishes in 23.50 s versus 32.71 s, with a 9.21 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ5 SUV is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the 216d Active Tourer at 195 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.56 kg/hp vs 12.24 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 18.36 seconds. The 6.82 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ5 SUV wins (4,42 s vs 11,24 s).
SQ5 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,42 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ5 SUV: 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp. 216d Active Tourer F44: 116 hp, ratio 12,24 kg/hp.
SQ5 SUV: 250 km/h. 216d Active Tourer F44: 195 km/h.