Over 0–100 km/h, SQ5 SUV wins (4,42 s vs 4,73 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ5 SUV | Macan S 95B.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s−0,31 s | 4,73 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,76 s−0,21 s | 12,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,50 s−0,17 s | 23,67 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 259 km/h−9 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,56 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,68 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ5 SUV | Macan S 95B.3 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,06 s | 1,21 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,78 s | 2,02 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,15 s | 3,41 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s | 4,73 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,02 s | 6,28 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,50 s | 10,65 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,55 s | 17,56 stight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 12,76 s | 12,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,50 s | 23,67 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 259 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 460 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 930 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
Off the line, the SQ5 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.42 s versus 4.73 s for the Macan S. At this point, the SQ5 SUV leads by 0.31 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ5 SUV is doing 142 km/h against 142 km/h for the Macan S. The gap is 0.23 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ5 SUV crosses the line in 12.76 s versus 12.97 s. The 0.21 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the SQ5 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 197 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ5 SUV finishes in 23.50 s versus 23.67 s, with a 0.16 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 259 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ5 SUV is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Macan S at 259 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.56 kg/hp vs 5.68 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.24 seconds. The 0.31 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ5 SUV wins (4,42 s vs 4,73 s).
SQ5 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,42 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ5 SUV: 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp. Macan S 95B.3: 340 hp, ratio 5,68 kg/hp.
SQ5 SUV: 250 km/h. Macan S 95B.3: 259 km/h.