Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 6,82 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | SQ6 SUV e-tron | Q6 SUV e-tron | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.37 s | 6.82 s | 2.46 s · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
| 400 m standing start | 12.70 s | 15.01 s | 2.31 s · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.29 s | 27.06 s | 3.77 s · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 210 km/h | 20 km/h · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4.76 kg/hp | 7.28 kg/hp | better ratio · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | SQ6 SUV e-tron | Q6 SUV e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.16 s | 1.93 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.93 s | 3.22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.21 s | 5.19 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.37 s | 6.82 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5.84 s | 8.93 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10.17 s | 15.78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16.87 s | 28.10 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12.70 s | 15.01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.29 s | 27.06 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 210 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 509 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 302 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 485 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 200 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the SQ6 SUV e-tron hits 100 km/h in 4.37 s versus 6.82 s for the Q6 SUV e-tron. At this point, the SQ6 SUV e-tron leads by 2.46 s and sits roughly 25 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron is doing 144 km/h against 128 km/h for the Q6 SUV e-tron. The gap is 1.73 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ6 SUV e-tron crosses the line in 12.70 s versus 15.00 s. The 2.31 s gap represents roughly 97 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron finishes in 23.29 s versus 27.06 s, with a 3.77 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ6 SUV e-tron is capped at 230 km/h, the Q6 SUV e-tron at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.76 kg/hp vs 7.28 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.26 seconds. The 2.46 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 6,82 s).
SQ6 SUV e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 509 hp, ratio 4,76 kg/hp. Q6 SUV e-tron: 302 hp, ratio 7,28 kg/hp.
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 230 km/h. Q6 SUV e-tron: 210 km/h.