Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 6,74 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ6 SUV e-tron | X2 xDrive25e F39 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s−2,38 s | 6,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s−2,19 s | 14,89 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,29 s−4,03 s | 27,32 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+35 km/h | 195 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,76 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,86 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ6 SUV e-tron | X2 xDrive25e F39 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,16 s | 1,46 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,93 s | 2,49 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,21 s | 4,65 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s | 6,74 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,84 s | 9,34 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,17 s | 16,97 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16,87 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s | 14,89 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,29 s | 27,32 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 195 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 509 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 385 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the SQ6 SUV e-tron hits 100 km/h in 4.37 s versus 6.74 s for the Bmw X2 xDrive25e. At this point, the SQ6 SUV e-tron leads by 2.38 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron is doing 144 km/h against 122 km/h for the Bmw X2 xDrive25e. The gap is 1.40 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ6 SUV e-tron crosses the line in 12.70 s versus 14.89 s. The 2.19 s gap represents roughly 89 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 169 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron finishes in 23.29 s versus 27.32 s, with a 4.03 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ6 SUV e-tron is capped at 230 km/h, the Bmw X2 xDrive25e at 195 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.76 kg/hp vs 7.86 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.91 seconds. The 2.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 6,74 s).
SQ6 SUV e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 509 hp, ratio 4,76 kg/hp. X2 xDrive25e F39: 220 hp, ratio 7,86 kg/hp.
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 230 km/h. X2 xDrive25e F39: 195 km/h.