Over 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV wins (4,03 s vs 4,69 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | SQ7 SUV | M4 Convertible F82 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.03 s | 4.69 s | 0.66 s · SQ7 SUV |
| 400 m standing start | 12.12 s | 12.65 s | 0.53 s · SQ7 SUV |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21.97 s | 22.52 s | 0.55 s · SQ7 SUV |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h | Same |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4.47 kg/hp | 4.15 kg/hp | better ratio · M4 Convertible F82 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | SQ7 SUV | M4 Convertible F82 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.13 s | 1.38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.88 s | 2.29 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.05 s | 3.63 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.03 s | 4.69 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5.25 s | 5.96 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8.57 s | 9.29 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13.51 s | 14.14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12.12 s | 12.65 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21.97 s | 22.52 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 770 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 265 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 431 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 790 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed M Steptronic with double clutch and Drivelogic) |
Off the line, the SQ7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.03 s versus 4.69 s for the M4 Convertible. At this point, the SQ7 SUV leads by 0.66 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ7 SUV is doing 154 km/h against 151 km/h for the M4 Convertible. The gap is 0.49 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ7 SUV crosses the line in 12.11 s versus 12.64 s. The 0.53 s gap represents roughly 28 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the SQ7 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 213 km/h versus 213 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ7 SUV finishes in 21.97 s versus 22.51 s, with a 0.54 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the SQ7 SUV and the M4 Convertible are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.47 kg/hp vs 4.15 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.66 seconds. The 0.66 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV wins (4,03 s vs 4,69 s).
SQ7 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,03 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ7 SUV: 507 hp, ratio 4,47 kg/hp. M4 Convertible F82: 431 hp, ratio 4,15 kg/hp.
SQ7 SUV: 250 km/h. M4 Convertible F82: 250 km/h.