F82 · GENERATION 2018 · SALOON
BMWICE

M4 Convertible

431 hp, 4,6 s 0-100 : among the 16 saloons 2016–2020, the M4 Convertible ranks 13th of 16 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 16 in Top speed, 10th of 16 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,09115,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

431hp

550 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.6s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

10.2L

/100 km

Tank

60L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW M4 Convertible

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture6 cyl.
Displacement2,979 cm³
Power431 hp
Couple550 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage 6 rapports Automatique

Consumption

Cons. WLTP10.2 L/100km
Tank60 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,6 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,671 mm
Wheelbase2,812 mm
Width1,870 mm
Height1,386 mm
Boot220 L
Kerb weight1,790 kg
Cd0.34
CO₂ WLTP233 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 16 saloons, the M4 Convertible ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 5th of 16 in Top speed (250 km/h). 5th of 16 in Top speed (250 km/h).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw M3 Competition (1st with 3.9 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio (1st with 307 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.6 s 0-100 (13th of 16 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the M4 Convertible ranks 13th of 16 in 0–100 km/h, 0.7 s off the reference Bmw M3 Competition (3.9 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (5th of 16 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 307 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the M4 Convertible stands against saloons

Comparison across 16 saloons marketed between 2016–2020.

0–100 km/h13e / 16
4,6 s
Min 6,0 s · Lexus IS 350 F Sport RWDMax 3,9 s · Bmw M3 Competition
Top speed5e / 16
250 km/h
Min 240 km/h · Lexus IS 350 F Sport RWDMax 307 km/h · Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio
Power-to-weight10e / 16
241 hp/t
Min 169 hp/t · Kia Stinger 2.5T RWDMax 323 hp/t · Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW M4 F82 range

Generation F82 launched in 2014. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F82

Compare

Popular duels involving the M4 Convertible

Frequently asked questions

BMW M4 Convertible: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 16 saloons 2016–2020, the M4 Convertible ranks 13th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (4.6 s, behind the Bmw M3 Competition), 5th of 16 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio), 10th of 16 in Power-to-weight (241 hp/t, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw M3 Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s vs 4.6 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the M4 Convertible vs Bmw M3 Competition duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.