4M · GENERATION 2026 · LARGE SUV
AudiICE

SQ7 SUV

507 hp, 4,1 s 0-100 : among the 8 E-SUV 2024–2028, the SQ7 SUV ranks 3rd of 8 in 0–100 km/h, 1st of 8 in Top speed, 5th of 8 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,22515,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

507hp

770 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.1s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

12.5L

/100 km

Tank

85L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Audi SQ7 SUV

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown
Displacement3,996 cm\u00b3
Power507 hp
Couple770 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionAWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP12,5 L/100km
Tank85 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,1 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length5,072 mm
Wheelbase2,999 mm
Width1,970 mm
Height1,690 mm
Boot793 L
Kerb weight2,265 kg
Cd0.34
CO₂ WLTP284 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 8 E-SUV, the SQ7 SUV ranks (top 3 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 3rd of 8 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 1st of 8 in Top speed (250 km/h). 3rd of 8 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 1st of 8 in Top speed (250 km/h).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 12,5 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Audi RS Q8 SUV (1st with 3.6 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Power-to-weight, the Audi RS Q8 SUV (1st with 281 hp/t) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.1 s 0-100 (3rd of 8 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the SQ7 SUV ranks 3rd of 8 in 0–100 km/h, 0.5 s off the reference Audi RS Q8 SUV (3.6 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (1st of 8 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 250 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the SQ7 SUV stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 8 E-SUV marketed between 2024–2028.

0–100 km/h

3eout of 8

4,1 s
Min5,6 s · Audi Q8 SUV
Max3,6 s · Audi RS Q8 SUV

Top speed

1eout of 8

250 km/h
Min250 km/h · Audi Q8 SUV
Max250 km/h · Audi SQ7 SUV

Power-to-weight

5eout of 8

224 hp/t
Min161 hp/t · Audi Q7 SUV
Max281 hp/t · Audi RS Q8 SUV

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Audi SQ7 4M range

Generation 4M launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the 4M

Compare

Popular duels involving the SQ7 SUV

Take the next step

Find a SQ7 SUV or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Audi SQ7 SUV: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the SQ7 SUV rank in its segment?#

Among the 8 E-SUV 2024–2028, the SQ7 SUV ranks 3rd of 8 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s, behind the Audi RS Q8 SUV), 1st of 8 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Audi SQ7 SUV), 5th of 8 in Power-to-weight (224 hp/t, behind the Audi RS Q8 SUV).

How much does the SQ7 SUV cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Audi RS Q8 SUV instead?#

The Audi RS Q8 SUV leads in 0–100 km/h (3.6 s vs 4.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the SQ7 SUV vs Audi RS Q8 SUV duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.