Over 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV wins (4,03 s vs 5,73 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ7 SUV | Cayenne S 958.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,03 s−1,71 s | 5,73 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,12 s−1,80 s | 13,92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,97 s−3,24 s | 25,21 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 255 km/h−5 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,47 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,92 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ7 SUV | Cayenne S 958.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,41 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,88 s | 2,31 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,05 s | 4,14 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,03 s | 5,73 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,25 s | 7,71 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,57 s | 12,97 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,51 s | 21,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,12 s | 13,92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,97 s | 25,21 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 255 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 770 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 265 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp | Engine block and cylinder heads formed in aluminum |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 065 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the SQ7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.03 s versus 5.73 s for the Cayenne S. At this point, the SQ7 SUV leads by 1.71 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ7 SUV is doing 154 km/h against 133 km/h for the Cayenne S. The gap is 1.18 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ7 SUV crosses the line in 12.11 s versus 13.92 s. The 1.80 s gap represents roughly 80 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ7 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 213 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ7 SUV finishes in 21.97 s versus 25.21 s, with a 3.24 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 255 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ7 SUV is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Cayenne S at 258 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.47 kg/hp vs 4.92 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.75 seconds. The 1.71 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV wins (4,03 s vs 5,73 s).
SQ7 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,03 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ7 SUV: 507 hp, ratio 4,47 kg/hp. Cayenne S 958.1: 420 hp, ratio 4,92 kg/hp.
SQ7 SUV: 250 km/h. Cayenne S 958.1: 255 km/h.