958.1 · GENERATION 2013 · LARGE SUV
PorscheICE

Cayenne S

420 hp, 5,7 s 0-100 : among the 22 E-SUV 2011–2015, the Cayenne S ranks 10th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 9th of 22 in Top speed, 7th of 22 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,38015,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

420hp

550 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

5.7s

VMax 258 km/h

Cons.

13.1L

/100 km

Tank

85.171725L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche Cayenne S

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · Naturally Aspirated
Displacement4,806 cm\u00b3
Puissance thermique406 hp
Combined power420 hp
Combined torque550 Nm
GearboxTORQUE_CONVERTER Unknown
TransmissionActive all-wheel drive

Consumption

Cons. WLTP13,1 L/100km
Tank85.171725 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h5,7 s
VMax258 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,846 mm
Wheelbase2,896 mm
Width1,938 mm
Height1,699 mm
Boot63 L
Kerb weight2,065 kg
Cd0.36

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 22 E-SUV, the Cayenne S ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 7th of 22 in Power-to-weight (203 hp/t). 7th of 22 in Power-to-weight (203 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 13,1 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo (1st with 4.2 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (1st with 282 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 5.7 s 0-100 (10th of 22 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Cayenne S ranks 10th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 1.5 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo (4.2 s).

Top speed: 258 km/h (9th of 22 in Top speed)

Top speed of 258 km/h. The segment reference reaches 282 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the Cayenne S stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 22 E-SUV marketed between 2011–2015.

0–100 km/h

10eout of 22

5,7 s
Min7,5 s · Porsche Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)
Max4,2 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo

Top speed

9eout of 22

258 km/h
Min229 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Platinum Edition
Max282 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S

Power-to-weight

7eout of 22

203 hp/t
Min150 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)
Max263 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the Cayenne S

Take the next step

Find a Cayenne S or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Porsche Cayenne S: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the Cayenne S rank in its segment?#

Among the 22 E-SUV 2011–2015, the Cayenne S ranks 10th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (5.7 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo), 9th of 22 in Top speed (258 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 7th of 22 in Power-to-weight (203 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).

How much does the Cayenne S cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Porsche Cayenne Turbo instead?#

The Porsche Cayenne Turbo leads in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s vs 5.7 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne S vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.