Over 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 wins (6,27 s vs 6,43 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | 128ti F40 | Focus ST 250 Gen3 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.27 s | 6.43 s | 0.16 s · 128ti F40 |
| 400 m standing start | 14.44 s | 14.56 s | 0.12 s · 128ti F40 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.87 s | 25.77 s | 0.10 s · Focus ST 250 Gen3 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 254 km/h | 4 km/h · Focus ST 250 Gen3 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5.45 kg/hp | 5.56 kg/hp | better ratio · 128ti F40 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 128ti F40 | Focus ST 250 Gen3 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.81 s · tight gap | 1.83 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.01 s · tight gap | 3.06 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.76 s | 5.09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.27 s | 6.43 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8.20 s | 8.42 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13.63 s | 13.56 s · tight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 22.97 s | 21.65 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.44 s · tight gap | 14.56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.87 s | 25.77 s · tight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 254 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 445 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 390 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the 128ti hits 100 km/h in 6.27 s versus 6.43 s for the Focus ST 250 Gen3. At this point, the 128ti leads by 0.16 s and sits roughly 4 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 128ti is doing 132 km/h against 134 km/h for the Focus ST 250 Gen3. The gap is 0.17 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the 128ti crosses the line in 14.44 s versus 14.55 s. The 0.11 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. Past 400 metres, both rivals hit the same electronic ceiling at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. Neither can claw back ground through top speed - the outcome hinges on the acceleration curve between 100 and 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h.
At 1,000 metres, the Focus ST 250 Gen3 finishes in 25.77 s versus 25.86 s. The 0.09 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the 128ti never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.45 kg/hp vs 5.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.42 seconds. The 0.16 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 wins (6,27 s vs 6,43 s).
128ti F40 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,27 seconds (calibrated simulation).
128ti F40: 265 hp, ratio 5,45 kg/hp. Focus ST 250 Gen3: 250 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp.
128ti F40: 250 km/h. Focus ST 250 Gen3: 254 km/h.