Sur 0–100 km/h, 320d G20 gagne (6,95 s vs 7,79 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| A4 40 TDI | 320d G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,79 s | 6,95 s+0,84 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,77 s | 15,06 s+0,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,09 s | 27,81 s+0,28 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 242 km/h+8 km/h | 234 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,29 kg/hp | 8,11 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | A4 40 TDI | 320d G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,16 s | 1,30 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,61 s | 2,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,84 s | 4,74 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,79 s | 6,95 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,28 s | 9,82 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 17,57 s | 18,29 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 30,63 s | 34,36 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,77 s | 15,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,09 s | 27,81 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h | 234 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 575 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 320d hits 100 km/h in 6.95 s versus 7.79 s for the A4 40 TDI. At this point, the Bmw 320d leads by 0.84 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320d is doing 119 km/h against 122 km/h for the A4 40 TDI. The gap is 0.86 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320d crosses the line in 15.06 s versus 15.77 s. The 0.71 s gap represents roughly 30 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Bmw 320d maxes out at 234 km/h while the A4 40 TDI keeps accelerating towards 242 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 0.56 s from 0.71 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320d finishes in 27.80 s versus 28.08 s, with just 0.28 s to spare. The A4 40 TDI fails to fully close the launch gap.
Electronically capped at 235 km/h, the Bmw 320d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.29 kg/hp vs 8.11 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.76 seconds. The 0.84 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 320d G20 gagne (6,95 s vs 7,79 s).
A4 40 TDI passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,79 secondes (simulation calibrée).
A4 40 TDI : 190 hp, ratio 8,29 kg/hp. 320d G20 : 190 hp, ratio 8,11 kg/hp.
A4 40 TDI : 242 km/h. 320d G20 : 234 km/h.