Over 0–100 km/h, 520e G30 and CLA 200 Saloon are neck and neck (8,07 s vs 8,09 s, no significant gap).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | 520e G30 | CLA 200 Saloon | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8.07 s | 8.09 s | 0.02 s · 520e G30 |
| 400 m standing start | 15.87 s | 15.93 s | 0.06 s · 520e G30 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29.49 s | 28.74 s | 0.75 s · CLA 200 Saloon |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 213 km/h | 232 km/h | 19 km/h · CLA 200 Saloon |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9.31 kg/hp | 9.27 kg/hp | better ratio · CLA 200 Saloon |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 520e G30 | CLA 200 Saloon |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.44 s | 1.85 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.58 s | 3.13 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5.37 s | 5.68 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8.07 s · tight gap | 8.09 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11.61 s | 11.03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 22.82 s | 19.52 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 52.29 s | 33.98 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15.87 s · tight gap | 15.93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29.49 s | 28.74 s |
| Top speed | 213 km/h | 232 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 330 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 705 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the 520e hits 100 km/h in 8.07 s versus 8.09 s for the CLA 200 Saloon. The instant torque of 350 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 0.02 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the 520e is doing 113 km/h against 116 km/h for the CLA 200 Saloon. The gap is 0.28 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the 520e crosses the line in 15.86 s versus 15.93 s. The 0.06 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The 520e maxes out at 213 km/h while the CLA 200 Saloon keeps accelerating towards 232 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.20 s.
Around 447 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the CLA 200 Saloon overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 19 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the CLA 200 Saloon finishes in 28.73 s versus 29.49 s. The 0.76 s delta in favour of the CLA 200 Saloon shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the 520e is capped at 218 km/h, the CLA 200 Saloon at 232 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.80 seconds. The 0.02 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 520e G30 and CLA 200 Saloon are neck and neck (8,07 s vs 8,09 s, no significant gap).
520e G30 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,07 seconds (calibrated simulation).
520e G30: 204 hp, ratio 9,31 kg/hp. CLA 200 Saloon: 184 hp, ratio 9,27 kg/hp.
520e G30: 213 km/h. CLA 200 Saloon: 232 km/h.