Performance duelHome › Duel

Bmw i4 eDrive35 G26 vs Volvo XC60 D5 AWD Geartronic : which one is faster?

0-100 km/h, 400 m, 1000 m, top speed — physics simulation calibrated on 7 measures.

Bmw i4 eDrive35400 m
VMax
84
0 – 100 km/h
6.08s
1.07 s
i4
7.15s
400 m standing start
14.38s
0.82 s
i4
15.20s
Top speed
190
36 km/h
XC60
226
Power286 ch
Power238 ch
Torque400 Nm
Torque480 Nm
Weight2 000 kg
Weight1 875 kg
Drivetraini4 eDrive35
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive (AWD)
GearboxAutomatic
GearboxAutomatic · 8 sp.
Faster
Bmw i4 eDrive35
BMW
i4 eDrive35 G26
2024
6,08 s
190 km/h
Power286 ch
Torque400 Nm
Weight2 000 kg
Drivetraini4 eDrive35
VMax
Volvo
XC60 D5 AWD Geartronic
2017
7,15 s
226 km/h
Power238 ch
Torque480 Nm
Weight1 875 kg
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive (AWD)
Bmw i4 eDrive35
2024 · ELECTRIC · 286 ch
Volvo XC60 D5 AWD Geartronic
2017 · PETROL · 238 ch
0-30 km/h1,69 s
0-50 km/h2,81 s
0-80 km/h4,56 s
0-100 km/h6,08 s
0-120 km/h8,04 s
0-160 km/h14,28 s
0-200 km/h---
400 m DA14,38 s
1 000 m DA26,26 s
VMax190 km/h
0-30 km/h1,34 s
0-50 km/h2,33 s
0-80 km/h4,92 s
0-100 km/h7,15 s
0-120 km/h10,16 s
0-160 km/h19,00 s
0-200 km/h37,43 s
400 m DA15,20 s
1 000 m DA28,11 s
VMax226 km/h
— : non calculé (vitesse max constructeur inférieure au seuil)
DQM93%
i4 eDrive35
--
XC60 D5 AWD Geartronic
--

Simulation de performance

Race simulation at real speed

CONFIDENCE 93%
400 m result
14.38s
Bmw i4 eDrive35
Gap
0.82s
Distance
400 m
Dist.
Bmw i4
Gap
XC60 D5
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
100 m
6.45 s
104 km/h
~1 m
6.40 s
94 km/h
200 m
9.48 s
131 km/h
~10 m
2 long.
9.77 s
118 km/h
400 m
14.38 s
160 km/h
~33 m
7 long.
15.20 s
146 km/h
600 m
18.60 s
179 km/h
~56 m
12 long.
19.86 s
163 km/h
1,000 m
26.26 s
190 km/h
~94 m
20½ long.
28.10 s
185 km/h

Calibrated physics simulation: SCx via VMax, power curves, Crr via WLTP, drivetrain losses. Manufacturer 0-100 is the calibration target. Confidence 93 %.

400 m
RACE MODE

Upcoming offersExclusive

Receive personalized offers

Pour recevoir les meilleures offres près de chez vous



Bmw i4 eDrive35 vs XC60 D5 AWD Geartronic: chronicle of a drag race at 226 km/h

The launch: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Bmw i4 eDrive35 hits 100 km/h in 6.08 s versus 7.15 s for the XC60 D5 AWD Geartronic. The instant torque of 400 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. Despite the faster sprint time, the XC60 D5 AWD Geartronic is 2 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Bmw i4 eDrive35 is doing 131 km/h against 118 km/h for the XC60 D5 AWD Geartronic. The gap is 0.29 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw i4 eDrive35 crosses the line in 14.38 s versus 15.20 s. The 0.82 s gap represents roughly 33 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Bmw i4 eDrive35 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 179 km/h versus 163 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw i4 eDrive35 finishes in 26.26 s versus 28.10 s, with a 1.85 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (226 km/h), the XC60 D5 AWD Geartronic never recovers its launch deficit.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw i4 eDrive35 is capped at 190 km/h, the XC60 D5 AWD Geartronic at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.91 seconds. The 1.07 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Bmw i4 eDrive35 has a clear edge over the Volvo XC60 D5 AWD Geartronic to 100 km/h. This difference is clearly noticeable in spirited driving and widens on standing starts.

Données de performance issues de simulations physiques calibrées (moteur Apex). Consommation basée sur les données WLTP constructeur. Les performances réelles peuvent varier selon les conditions d'utilisation.

Prix énergie indicatifs : essence 1,85€/L, diesel 1,75€/L, électricité 0,25€/kWh (tarif domestique). Calculs basés sur 20 000 km/an.

Caralogy est un service indépendant de comparaison. Les données affichées sont fournies à titre informatif et ne constituent pas une offre commerciale.