Over 0–100 km/h, i4 M50 xDrive G26 wins (3,92 s vs 5,06 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| i4 M50 xDrive G26 | Macan GTS 95B.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,92 s−1,14 s | 5,06 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,01 s−1,37 s | 13,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,97 s−2,43 s | 24,40 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 225 km/h | 256 km/h−31 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,07 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,26 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | i4 M50 xDrive G26 | Macan GTS 95B.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,89 s | 2,19 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,04 s | 3,76 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,92 s | 5,06 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,04 s | 6,87 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,35 s | 11,56 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,16 s | 19,52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,01 s | 13,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,97 s | 24,40 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h | 256 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 544 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 795 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 215 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
Off the line, the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive hits 100 km/h in 3.92 s versus 5.06 s for the Macan GTS. The instant torque of 795 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive leads by 1.14 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive is doing 155 km/h against 138 km/h for the Macan GTS. The gap is 0.88 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive crosses the line in 12.01 s versus 13.37 s. The 1.37 s gap represents roughly 63 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 191 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive finishes in 21.97 s versus 24.40 s, with a 2.43 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (256 km/h), the Macan GTS never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive is capped at 225 km/h, the Macan GTS at 256 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.89 seconds. The 1.14 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, i4 M50 xDrive G26 wins (3,92 s vs 5,06 s).
i4 M50 xDrive G26 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,92 seconds (calibrated simulation).
i4 M50 xDrive G26: 544 hp, ratio 4,07 kg/hp. Macan GTS 95B.1: 360 hp, ratio 5,26 kg/hp.
i4 M50 xDrive G26: 225 km/h. Macan GTS 95B.1: 256 km/h.