Over 0–100 km/h, i5 eDrive40 G60 and C 300 W206 are neck and neck (6,03 s vs 6,12 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| i5 eDrive40 G60 | C 300 W206 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s | 6,03 s+0,09 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s | 14,22 s+0,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s | 25,47 s+0,40 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 193 km/h | 250 km/h−57 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,81 kg/hp | 6,36 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | i5 eDrive40 G60 | C 300 W206 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,79 s | 1,63 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,98 s | 2,70 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,78 s | 4,52 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s | 6,03 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,84 s | 8,04 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,27 s | 13,25 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 21,50 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s | 14,22 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s | 25,47 s |
| Top speed limited | 193 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 130 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-stage with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 9G-Tronic automatic |
Off the line, the C 300 hits 100 km/h in 6.03 s versus 6.12 s for the i5 eDrive40. Despite lacking instant torque, 258 hp of power compensates. The 0.09 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the C 300 is doing 132 km/h against 135 km/h for the i5 eDrive40. The gap is 0.12 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the C 300 crosses the line in 14.22 s versus 14.29 s. The 0.08 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the C 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 186 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the C 300 finishes in 25.46 s versus 25.87 s, with a 0.40 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the i5 eDrive40 is capped at 193 km/h, the C 300 at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.14 seconds. The 0.09 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, i5 eDrive40 G60 and C 300 W206 are neck and neck (6,03 s vs 6,12 s, no significant gap).
i5 eDrive40 G60 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,12 seconds (calibrated simulation).
i5 eDrive40 G60: 313 hp, ratio 6,81 kg/hp. C 300 W206: 258 hp, ratio 6,36 kg/hp.
i5 eDrive40 G60: 193 km/h. C 300 W206: 250 km/h.