Over 0–100 km/h, i5 xDrive40 G60 wins (5,30 s vs 5,49 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| i5 xDrive40 G60 | 740e iPerformance G11 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s−0,19 s | 5,49 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,59 s−0,10 s | 13,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s−0,32 s | 24,90 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 215 km/h | 250 km/h−35 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,79 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,83 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | i5 xDrive40 G60 | 740e iPerformance G11 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,43 s | 1,27 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,39 s | 2,12 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,92 s | 3,79 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s | 5,49 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,04 s | 7,38 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,04 s | 12,61 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,54 s | 20,69 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,59 s | 13,69 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s | 24,90 s |
| Top speed limited | 215 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 394 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 590 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 280 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-stage with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the i5 xDrive40 hits 100 km/h in 5.30 s versus 5.49 s for the 740e iPerformance. Despite the faster sprint time, the 740e iPerformance is 4 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the 740e iPerformance is doing 133 km/h against 137 km/h for the i5 xDrive40. The gap is 0.01 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the i5 xDrive40 crosses the line in 13.59 s versus 13.68 s. The 0.09 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the i5 xDrive40 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 187 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the i5 xDrive40 finishes in 24.58 s versus 24.90 s, with a 0.32 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), the 740e iPerformance never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the i5 xDrive40 is capped at 215 km/h, the 740e iPerformance at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.79 kg/hp vs 5.83 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.52 seconds. The 0.19 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, i5 xDrive40 G60 wins (5,30 s vs 5,49 s).
i5 xDrive40 G60 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,30 seconds (calibrated simulation).
i5 xDrive40 G60: 394 hp, ratio 5,79 kg/hp. 740e iPerformance G11: 326 hp, ratio 5,83 kg/hp.
i5 xDrive40 G60: 215 km/h. 740e iPerformance G11: 250 km/h.