Sur 0–100 km/h, M5 F90 gagne (3,44 s vs 3,71 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| iX M60 I20 | M5 F90 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s | 3,44 s+0,27 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s | 11,16 s+0,78 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s | 20,22 s+1,63 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,26 kg/hp | 3,11 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | iX M60 I20 | M5 F90 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,93 s | 1,01 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,54 s | 1,68 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,67 s | 2,64 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s | 3,44 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,03 s | 4,34 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,60 s | 6,74 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,69 s | 10,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s | 11,16 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s | 20,22 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 619 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 1100 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed reduction gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 865 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic, transmission oil cooling |
Off the line, the Bmw M5 hits 100 km/h in 3.44 s versus 3.72 s for the iX M60. Despite lacking instant torque, 600 hp of power compensates. Despite the faster sprint time, the iX M60 is 1 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M5 is doing 168 km/h against 151 km/h for the iX M60. The gap is 0.34 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M5 crosses the line in 11.16 s versus 11.94 s. The 0.78 s gap represents roughly 40 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M5 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 235 km/h versus 212 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M5 finishes in 20.22 s versus 21.84 s, with a 1.62 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the iX M60 and the Bmw M5 are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.80 seconds. The 0.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M5 F90 gagne (3,44 s vs 3,71 s).
iX M60 I20 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,71 secondes (simulation calibrée).
iX M60 I20 : 619 hp, ratio 4,26 kg/hp. M5 F90 : 600 hp, ratio 3,11 kg/hp.
iX M60 I20 : 250 km/h. M5 F90 : 250 km/h.