Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AiXvsBScenicBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsiX · Scenic

BMW iX M60 I20 vs Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

luxury SUV · 2022 vs 2024 · Methodology
BMWBEVFaster

iX M60 I20

619 hp · 1100 Nm · 2,640 kg · 2022

VS
RenaultBEV

Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

170 hp · 300 Nm · 1,777 kg · 2024

Result · 0–100 km/h

ABMW iX M60 I20

3.71 s

Gap4.46 sin favour of iX M60
BRenault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

8.18 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureiX M60 I20Scenic E-Tech Electric 170Gap
0–100 km/h3.71 s8.18 s4.46 s · iX M60 I20
400 m standing start11.94 s16.12 s4.18 s · iX M60 I20
1,000 m standing start21.85 s29.80 s7.95 s · iX M60 I20
Top speed (electronically limited)250 km/h211 km/h39 km/h · iX M60 I20
Power-to-weight ratio4.26 kg/hp10.45 kg/hpbetter ratio · iX M60 I20

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

BMWBEViX M60 I20
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
RenaultBEVScenic E-Tech Electric 170
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageiX M60 I20Scenic E-Tech Electric 170
0–30 km/h0.93 s1.90 s
0–50 km/h1.54 s3.17 s
0–80 km/h2.67 s5.71 s
0–100 km/h3.71 s8.18 s
0–120 km/h5.03 s11.49 s
0–160 km/h8.60 s23.49 s
0–200 km/h13.69 s58.58 s
400 m standing start11.94 s16.12 s
1,000 m standing start21.85 s29.80 s
Top speed limited250 km/h211 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

BMW

iX M60 I20

4,26kg/hpratio better by 6,19 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power619 hpPending
Torque1100 Nm
Weight2 640 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxSingle-speed reduction gear
Renault

Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

10,45kg/hpcompensated by −863 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power170 hpPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque300 Nm
Weight1 777 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the iX M60 hits 100 km/h in 3.72 s versus 8.18 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. At this point, the iX M60 leads by 4.47 s and sits roughly 28 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the iX M60 is doing 151 km/h against 115 km/h for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. The gap is 2.77 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the iX M60 crosses the line in 11.94 s versus 16.11 s. The 4.17 s gap represents roughly 152 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the iX M60 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 212 km/h versus 154 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the iX M60 finishes in 21.84 s versus 29.80 s, with a 7.96 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The iX M60 features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the iX M60 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.26 kg/hp vs 10.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.65 seconds. The 4.47 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

LamborghiniVSBMW

Urus SE vs iX M60

AudiVSRenault

Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW vs Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

BMWVSMercedes

iX M60 vs AMG G 63

AudiVSRenault

Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW vs Scenic E-Tech Electric 170

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, iX M60 I20 wins (3,71 s vs 8,18 s).

iX M60 I20 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,71 seconds (calibrated simulation).

iX M60 I20: 619 hp, ratio 4,26 kg/hp. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170: 170 hp, ratio 10,45 kg/hp.

iX M60 I20: 250 km/h. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170: 211 km/h.