Over 0–100 km/h, iX xDrive40 wins (6,04 s vs 7,84 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | iX xDrive40 | X2 xDrive20i F39 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.04 s | 7.84 s | 1.80 s · iX xDrive40 |
| 400 m standing start | 14.37 s | 15.73 s | 1.36 s · iX xDrive40 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26.37 s | 28.75 s | 2.38 s · iX xDrive40 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 221 km/h | 21 km/h · X2 xDrive20i F39 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.48 kg/hp | 8.02 kg/hp | better ratio · iX xDrive40 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | iX xDrive40 | X2 xDrive20i F39 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.42 s | 1.66 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.37 s | 2.90 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.25 s | 5.48 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.04 s | 7.84 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8.34 s | 10.89 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15.21 s | 19.94 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26.44 s | 40.05 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.37 s | 15.73 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26.37 s | 28.75 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 221 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 630 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 440 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed reduction gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the iX xDrive40 hits 100 km/h in 6.04 s versus 7.84 s for the X2 xDrive20i. The instant torque of 630 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the iX xDrive40 leads by 1.80 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the iX xDrive40 is doing 127 km/h against 116 km/h for the X2 xDrive20i. The gap is 0.92 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the iX xDrive40 crosses the line in 14.36 s versus 15.73 s. The 1.37 s gap represents roughly 54 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the iX xDrive40 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the iX xDrive40 finishes in 26.37 s versus 28.74 s, with a 2.38 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (221 km/h), the X2 xDrive20i never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the iX xDrive40 is capped at 200 km/h, the X2 xDrive20i at 224 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.70 seconds. The 1.80 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, iX xDrive40 wins (6,04 s vs 7,84 s).
iX xDrive40 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,04 seconds (calibrated simulation).
iX xDrive40: 326 hp, ratio 7,48 kg/hp. X2 xDrive20i F39: 192 hp, ratio 8,02 kg/hp.
iX xDrive40: 200 km/h. X2 xDrive20i F39: 221 km/h.