Among the 8 E-SUV electric 2019–2023, the iX xDrive40 ranks 8th of 8 in WLTP range (425 km, behind the BMW iX xDrive50), 7th of 8 in 0–100 km/h (6.1 s, behind the Tesla Model X Plaid).
BMW iX xDrive40
326 hp, 425 km range, 6,1 s 0-100 : among the 8 E-SUV electric 2019–2023, the iX xDrive40 ranks 8th of 8 in WLTP range, 7th of 8 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
326hp
630 Nm, dont 326 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.1s
VMax 200 km/h
Range
425km
WLTP
DC charging
-kW
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Puissance électrique
- 326 hp
- Combined power
- 326 hp
- Couple
- 630 Nm
- Gearbox
- Mono-rapport 1 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Battery and charging
- Battery capacity
- 76.6 kWh
- Range WLTP
- 425 km
- Conso élec WLTP
- 21.3 kWh/100 km
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6,1 s
- VMax
- 200 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,953 mm
- Wheelbase
- 3,000 mm
- Width
- 1,967 mm
- Height
- 1,696 mm
- Kerb weight
- 2,440 kg
- Cd
- 0.25
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 8 E-SUV electric, the iX xDrive40 ranks (last in segment) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is WLTP range, the BMW iX xDrive50 (1st with 630 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Tesla Model X Plaid (1st with 2.6 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 425 km WLTP (8th of 8 in WLTP range)
The iX xDrive40 offers 425 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the BMW iX xDrive50 (630 km).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceAutonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomieWhere the iX xDrive40 stands against E-SUV electric
Comparison across 8 E-SUV electric marketed between 2019–2023.
WLTP range8e / 8
425 km
Min 425 km · BMW iX xDrive40Max 630 km · BMW iX xDrive50
0–100 km/h7e / 8
6,1 s
Min 8,6 s · Xpeng G9Max 2,6 s · Tesla Model X Plaid
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
BEVTesla Model X 100D532 hp · 4.7 sBEVTesla Model X 90D532 hp · 5.0 sBEVTesla Model X Long Range 2020670 hp · 4.3 sBEVTesla Model X Long Range 2022670 hp · 4.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW iX range
Other versions
Popular duels involving the iX xDrive40
BMW iX xDrive40: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
425 km WLTP announced - making it the 8th of 8 in autonomie du segment out of 8 models. The reference is the BMW iX xDrive50 (630 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The BMW iX xDrive50 leads in WLTP range (630 km vs 425 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the iX xDrive40 vs BMW iX xDrive50 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.