Sur 0–100 km/h, M140i xDrive F20LCI gagne (4,43 s vs 7,03 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M140i xDrive F20LCI | Clio 3 RS 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,43 s−2,60 s | 7,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,64 s−2,56 s | 15,20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,01 s−4,22 s | 27,23 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+27 km/h | 223 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,53 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,20 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M140i xDrive F20LCI | Clio 3 RS 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,21 s | 2,02 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,00 s | 3,14 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,29 s | 5,44 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,43 s | 7,03 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,86 s | 9,53 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,81 s | 16,04 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,81 s | 27,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,64 s | 15,20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,01 s | 27,23 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 223 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 215 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual close-ratio |
Off the line, the Bmw M140i xDrive hits 100 km/h in 4.43 s versus 7.03 s for the Clio 3 RS 200. At this point, the Bmw M140i xDrive leads by 2.60 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M140i xDrive is doing 147 km/h against 125 km/h for the Clio 3 RS 200. The gap is 1.87 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M140i xDrive crosses the line in 12.64 s versus 15.20 s. The 2.55 s gap represents roughly 107 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M140i xDrive continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 203 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M140i xDrive finishes in 23.01 s versus 27.23 s, with a 4.22 s lead.
The Bmw M140i xDrive features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Clio 3 RS 200’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw M140i xDrive is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Clio 3 RS 200 at 223 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.53 kg/hp vs 6.20 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.83 seconds. The 2.60 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M140i xDrive F20LCI gagne (4,43 s vs 7,03 s).
M140i xDrive F20LCI passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,43 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M140i xDrive F20LCI : 340 hp, ratio 4,53 kg/hp. Clio 3 RS 200 : 200 hp, ratio 6,20 kg/hp.
M140i xDrive F20LCI : 250 km/h. Clio 3 RS 200 : 223 km/h.