Over 0–100 km/h, M2 G87 wins (4,12 s vs 5,15 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M2 G87 | X5 M50d F15 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,12 s−1,04 s | 5,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s−1,39 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,81 s−2,80 s | 24,61 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 285 km/h+35 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,76 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,69 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M2 G87 | X5 M50d F15 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,17 s | 1,33 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,95 s | 2,15 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,06 s | 3,71 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,12 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,26 s | 6,95 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,46 s | 12,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,14 s | 20,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,81 s | 24,61 s |
| Top speed limited | 285 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed M Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 275 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the M2 hits 100 km/h in 4.12 s versus 5.15 s for the Bmw X5 M50d. At this point, the M2 leads by 1.04 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the M2 is doing 155 km/h against 136 km/h for the Bmw X5 M50d. The gap is 0.81 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the M2 crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 13.47 s. The 1.39 s gap represents roughly 64 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the M2 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 189 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the M2 finishes in 21.80 s versus 24.60 s, with a 2.80 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the M2 is capped at 285 km/h, the Bmw X5 M50d at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.76 kg/hp vs 5.69 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.07 seconds. The 1.04 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, M2 G87 wins (4,12 s vs 5,15 s).
M2 G87 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,12 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M2 G87: 460 hp, ratio 3,76 kg/hp. X5 M50d F15: 400 hp, ratio 5,69 kg/hp.
M2 G87: 285 km/h. X5 M50d F15: 250 km/h.