Sur 0–100 km/h, M240i F22 gagne (4,51 s vs 4,78 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M240i F22 | M135i xDrive F40 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,51 s−0,27 s | 4,78 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,59 s−0,41 s | 13,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,59 s−1,00 s | 23,59 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,38 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,98 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M240i F22 | M135i xDrive F40 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,42 s | 1,33 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,29 s | 2,22 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,51 s | 3,58 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,51 s | 4,78 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,79 s | 6,30 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,24 s | 10,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,33 s | 17,07 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,59 s | 13,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,59 s | 23,59 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 490 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw M240i hits 100 km/h in 4.52 s versus 4.78 s for the Bmw M135i xDrive. The 0.27 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M240i is doing 151 km/h against 144 km/h for the Bmw M135i xDrive. The gap is 0.18 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M240i crosses the line in 12.59 s versus 13.00 s. The 0.41 s gap represents roughly 20 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M240i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 211 km/h versus 199 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M240i finishes in 22.59 s versus 23.59 s, with a 1.00 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw M240i and the Bmw M135i xDrive are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.38 kg/hp vs 4.98 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.19 seconds. The 0.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M240i F22 gagne (4,51 s vs 4,78 s).
M240i F22 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,51 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M240i F22 : 340 hp, ratio 4,38 kg/hp. M135i xDrive F40 : 306 hp, ratio 4,98 kg/hp.
M240i F22 : 250 km/h. M135i xDrive F40 : 250 km/h.