M135i xDrive
306 hp, 4,8 s 0-100 : among the 18 compacts 2019–2023, the M135i xDrive ranks 9th of 18 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 18 in Top speed, 11th of 18 in Power-to-weight, behind the only BMW M2. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
306hp
450 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.8s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
6.7L
/100 km
Tank
50L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW M135i xDrive
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 306 hp |
| Couple | 450 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6,7 L/100km |
| Tank | 50 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,8 s |
| VMax | 250 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,319 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm |
| Width | 1,799 mm |
| Height | 1,434 mm |
| Boot | 380 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,525 kg |
| Cd | 0.34 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 155 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 18 compacts, the M135i xDrive ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 5th of 18 in Top speed (250 km/h). 5th of 18 in Top speed (250 km/h).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW M2 (1st with 4.1 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the BMW M2 (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.8 s 0-100 (9th of 18 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the M135i xDrive ranks 9th of 18 in 0–100 km/h, 0.7 s off the reference BMW M2 (4.1 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (5th of 18 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the M135i xDrive stands against compacts
Comparison across 18 compacts marketed between 2019–2023.
0–100 km/h
9eout of 18
Top speed
5eout of 18
Power-to-weight
11eout of 18
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
S3 Sedan
333 hp · 0-100 4.7 s
S3 Sportback
333 hp · 0-100 4.7 s
RS 3 Sportback
400 hp · 0-100 3.8 s
RS 3 Sedan
400 hp · 0-100 3.8 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 1 Series F40 range
Generation F40 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F40
Compare
Popular duels involving the M135i xDrive
Take the next step
Find a M135i xDrive or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
BMW M135i xDrive: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 18 compacts 2019–2023, the M135i xDrive ranks 9th of 18 in 0–100 km/h (4.8 s, behind the BMW M2), 5th of 18 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the BMW M2), 11th of 18 in Power-to-weight (201 hp/t, behind the BMW M2).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The BMW M2 leads in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s vs 4.8 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the M135i xDrive vs BMW M2 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.