Over 0–100 km/h, M240i xDrive F22 wins (4,45 s vs 4,64 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M240i xDrive F22 | S3 Sportback | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,45 s−0,19 s | 4,64 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,67 s−0,42 s | 13,09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,03 s−0,69 s | 23,72 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,53 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,61 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M240i xDrive F22 | S3 Sportback |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,23 s | 1,23 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,02 s | 2,05 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,32 s | 3,41 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,45 s | 4,64 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,88 s | 6,63 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,85 s | 10,91 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,84 s | 17,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,67 s | 13,09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,03 s | 23,72 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the M240i xDrive hits 100 km/h in 4.45 s versus 4.64 s for the S3 Sportback. At this point, the M240i xDrive leads by 0.19 s and sits roughly 1 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the M240i xDrive is doing 147 km/h against 139 km/h for the S3 Sportback. The gap is 0.25 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the M240i xDrive crosses the line in 12.66 s versus 13.08 s. The 0.42 s gap represents roughly 20 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the M240i xDrive continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 203 km/h versus 197 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the M240i xDrive finishes in 23.03 s versus 23.72 s, with a 0.69 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the M240i xDrive and the S3 Sportback are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.53 kg/hp vs 4.61 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.65 seconds. The 0.19 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, M240i xDrive F22 wins (4,45 s vs 4,64 s).
M240i xDrive F22 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,45 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M240i xDrive F22: 340 hp, ratio 4,53 kg/hp. S3 Sportback: 333 hp, ratio 4,61 kg/hp.
M240i xDrive F22: 250 km/h. S3 Sportback: 250 km/h.