Over 0–100 km/h, M4 G82 wins (4,19 s vs 4,42 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 G82 | SQ5 Sportback | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,19 s−0,23 s | 4,42 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,23 s−0,53 s | 12,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,86 s−1,64 s | 23,50 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,54 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 G82 | SQ5 Sportback |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,22 s | 1,06 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,04 s | 1,78 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,31 s | 3,15 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,19 s | 4,42 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,52 s | 6,02 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,63 s | 10,50 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,02 s | 17,55 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,23 s | 12,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,86 s | 23,50 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 700 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 hits 100 km/h in 4.19 s versus 4.42 s for the SQ5 Sportback. Despite the faster sprint time, the SQ5 Sportback is 4 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 is doing 155 km/h against 142 km/h for the SQ5 Sportback. The gap is 0.13 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 crosses the line in 12.23 s versus 12.76 s. The 0.53 s gap represents roughly 26 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 219 km/h versus 196 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 finishes in 21.86 s versus 23.50 s, with a 1.64 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw M4 and the SQ5 Sportback are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.54 kg/hp vs 5.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.96 seconds. The 0.23 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M4 G82 wins (4,19 s vs 4,42 s).
M4 G82 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,19 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M4 G82: 480 hp, ratio 3,54 kg/hp. SQ5 Sportback: 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp.
M4 G82: 250 km/h. SQ5 Sportback: 250 km/h.